Random Insanity Alliance Forum, Mark V

Cactuar Zone => Random lnsanity => Topic started by: Shadow on October 20, 2013, 04:48:13 pm

Title: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Shadow on October 20, 2013, 04:48:13 pm
The official main trailer was released two weeks ago:

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Official Main Trailer (2013) - Lord of the Rings Movie HD (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvGcbFIfJos#)

So awseome. Can't wait for it to be out.

Also its going to have a running time of 2 hours, 36 minutes. >_>
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Snowbound Milk on October 20, 2013, 05:04:20 pm
I'm pretty excited too o_o
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Biff Webster on October 20, 2013, 05:28:49 pm
 :frogout:
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Pterrydactyl on October 21, 2013, 02:42:02 pm
I get more disappointed each time I hear of this stupidity.  Shortest book?  3 movies.  FUCK YOU PETER JACKSON.
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Fake from State Jarm on October 22, 2013, 08:43:59 am
I just dislike the extraneous orc characters they add in

'tolkien's storytelling just needed something extra, like a horribly voiced/acted/make-upped character with no real back-story or contribution to the story'
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Shadow on November 05, 2013, 10:08:05 pm
new trailer, even more epic then the previous ones:

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug - Sneak Peek [HD] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfflhfn1W-o#ws)
Title: Re: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Post by: Gangs on November 06, 2013, 02:45:01 am
I just dislike the extraneous orc characters they add in

'tolkien's storytelling just needed something extra, like a horribly voiced/acted/make-upped character with no real back-story or contribution to the story'
This...
I haven't even read the book and I could tell he was the 100 mill movie equivalent of a failed attempt at a people pleasing filler...