You bought into conservative propaganda and you want me to take "the red pill"
We are not funding ISIS. How the US is responsible for the """creation""" of ISIS is the destabilization of the Middle East, an event that happened because of the party that is now given power.
So, the Clinton Foundation is spooky in your eyes because people have put it under suspension, but no investigation has been started and there is no evidence of wrongdoing? Okay.
Meanwhile, in another topic, we had a giant list of Trump Foundation investigations going on. Why even mention the Clinton Foundation if investigating it doesn't actually change your opinion of Clinton anyway because it did nothing for your opinion on Trump?
"I don't think it's wrong to be suspicious of Trump too. but the first female president would only ever be criticized by secret rapehitlers, that's how it works in half the country's minds"
It doesn't. The US and Liberals are not in fact run by tumblr extremists. The most annoying idiots on tumblr and twitter are not the entire left and liberalism in this country.
In fact, I find it hard to believe that half your beliefs even align with the GOP.
There is no pill to take. The Red Pill never existed. It is fantasy. Now we get to relive the Bush era even harder.
Are you honestly going to tell me wikileaks is conservative propaganda?
https://medium.com/@trentlapinski/dear-democrats-read-this-if-you-do-not-understand-why-trump-won-5a0cdb13c597#.abe06rixaFrom another article:
"The Washington Post found that two months after Secretary Clinton encouraged the Russian government to approve a $3.7 billion deal with Boeing, the aerospace company announced a $900,000 donation to the Clinton Foundation.
The Wall Street Journal found that Clinton made an “unusual intervention” to announce a legal settlement with UBS, after which the Swiss bank increased its donations to, and involvement with, the Clinton Foundation.
The New York Times reported that a Russian company assumed control of major uranium reserves in a deal that required State Department approval, as the chairman of the company involved in the transaction donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation."
Both foundations may be dirty. The demonstrated, systemic collusion on behalf of HRC leads me to believe this is why hers hasn't been investigated. However her foundation operated while she was under the employ of the American people, and it continues to. You might say, well Trump's was recent, he could end up continuing the same behavior. Fair point, but don't pretend Hillary is an angel. One of their aides said he could name over 500 conflicts of interests. Even Chelsea Clinton had concerns. This is not republican propaganda. The idea that it is republican propaganda
is liberal propaganda.
As for ISIS it's probably true we're not funding them anymore. But we did fund jihadis in Syria after being informed they would form ISIS. And we continued to fund them after they became ISIS.
$500m from congress:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2014/06/27/obama-wants-500-million-to-train-syrian-rebels-now-what/almost $1b via CIA yearly even after ISIS had formed:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/lawmakers-move-to-curb-1-billion-cia-program-to-train-syrian-rebels/2015/06/12/b0f45a9e-1114-11e5-adec-e82f8395c032_story.htmland here's the DIA memo stating early on that the Syrian rebels were jihadis that were likely to form an islamic state, and that this was even a desirable result to fight against Assad -- although there's speculation that last part was a way for people that thought it was wrong, to cover their ass by hinting at Obama's intentional complicity.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdfThis is what the liberal media fails to report. It is not propaganda, it's a matter of public record. Granted Bush contributed to that whole situation too, but ISIS was funded under the Obama administration. and HRC has been touted as the continuation of Obama's 'legacy.' Trump might make similar mistakes, but in foreign policy he is all bark so far, whereas she is a rabid dog. And guess who Trump is buddies with? The guy in charge of the DIA when it called the formation of ISIS... who then got fired for not going along with the Obama administration. (
https://youtu.be/SG3j8OYKgn4) So it's feasible to at least hope they won't be as naive.